I’ve noticed more and more people thinking they can publish blogs in just a few clicks. They load up an AI tool, press a button, and let it do all the work.
On the surface, it looks like a blog. But if you take a closer look, you can usually tell when something has been written by AI. If we can spot it, you can be sure Google can spot it too. And so can other AI systems.
In a recent post, I talked about the rise of GEO content and how it differs from SEO. I also covered how you can create content that works for both. But now, we need to talk about something different.
If you are going to rely on AI to churn out content without any real thought, it will not do you much good.
The telltale signs of AI-generated content
It is not just the words that give it away. The formatting often does too:
Another common issue is how AI is used to replace actual research and the hard work of building a detailed first draft. If you ask an AI tool to share its sources, it will often struggle. The facts it produces are not always accurate, and sometimes they are outdated or even entirely made up. That makes it risky to rely on AI without factchecking and adding your own expertise.
What search engines think
Google does not publish the exact details of how it detects AI writing, but it is always analysing content quality. Search has moved on from just matching keywords.
Today, search engines care more about whether your content is:
What readers think
If AI does not like AI content and Google does not like AI content, what about your audience?
A blog that is hard to read, overly technical, or full of filler will not keep a reader’s attention. Your customers are looking for answers, clarity, and personality. AI alone struggles to deliver that.
The truth is, great content still needs a human touch. AI can help with research, structure, or even first drafts, but it cannot replace your voice or your understanding of your audience.